Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Duarte v. Norfolk County Sheriff's Office et al
as 1:2023cv11725
Plaintiff:
Eric J. Duarte
Defendant:
Norfolk County Sheriff's Office, Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Sheriff Patrick W. McDermott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hooley v. Warden Valley
as 1:2023cv00162
Petitioner:
Thomas K. Hooley
Respondent:
Warden Valley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Arthur Beatty, Sr. v. Chaplain Hinshaw, et al
as 22-1701
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ARTHUR BEATTY, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
CHAPLAIN HINSHAW and COUNSELOR HOOLEY
DIXON v. LOWERY et al
as 3:2019cv00029
Defendant:
MS. BYERS, LOWERY, J. HOOLEY and others
Plaintiff:
ALBERT DIXON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BEATTY v. HENSHAW et al
as 1:2019cv00622
Defendant:
INMATE UTAH DOCKERY #143189, HENSHAW and HOOLEY
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR BEATTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hooley v. Blades
as 1:2016cv00418
Petitioner:
Thomas K. Hooley
Respondent:
Randy Blades
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Crotty v. Massachusetts Parole Board, et al
as 12-1360
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD CROTTY
Defendant - Appellee:
MASSACHUSETTS PAROLE BOARD, MARK A. CONRAD, individually and in their capacity as members of the Massachusetts Parole Board, CANDACE KOCHIN, individually and in their capacity as members of the Massachusetts Parole Board and others
Porter v. Jagels, et al.
as 1:2012cv00404
Plaintiff:
Thomas Porter
Defendant:
Edward R. Jagels, Ron E Coffee, Bill Lockyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crotty v. Massachusetts Parole Board et al
as 4:2010cv40245
Plaintiff:
Richard Crotty
Defendant:
Massachusetts Parole Board, Mark A. Conrad, Candace Kochin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Becker v. Hudson et al
as 6:2007cv06315
Petitioner:
Jan F. Becker
Respondent:
Hudson, Michael B. Mukasey, Robert A. Fiatal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
