Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Steed v. Lynch et al
as 5:2024ct03105
Plaintiff:
Byron Steed
Defendant:
Sgt. Lynch, Sgt. Bunn, Sgt. Hobgood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cromartie v. Reams et al
as 5:2024ct03098
Plaintiff:
Christopher D. Cromartie, Jr.
Defendant:
Ashston Reams, Susan Addams, Marcus Houis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hobgood v. Unknown
as 3:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Thomas Hobgood
Defendant:
Unknown, Sargeant Walass, Miss Moodey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hobgood v. Dave's et al
as 3:2023cv00571
Plaintiff:
Thomas Hobgood
Defendant:
Mis Dave's and Mr Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hobgood v. Jarit et al
as 3:2023cv00554
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Hobgood, Jr.
Defendant:
Ms. Jarit, Ms. Barnes, Mr. Bhat and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hobgood v. Wilshire et al
as 3:2023cv00492
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Hobgood, Jr.
Defendant:
Miss Wilshire, Mr. Faulk and Mr. Hayes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hobgood v. Oliver
as 1:2023cv03258
Petitioner:
Terry Gene Hobgood
Respondent:
Commissioner, Tyrone Oliver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RICE v. ROGERS
as 1:2022cv00335
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL DANTE RICE
Defendant:
DANNY ROGERS, ARAMARK, INC., WELL PATH, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MEBANE v. CLARK et al
as 1:2022cv00131
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MEBANE, LARRY JUNIOR MERIS and RAYMOND SCHOFIELD HYATT
Defendant:
SERGEANT CLARK, CAPTAIN JOHNSON, CAPTAIN SELLERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CLOSSON v. KOHLHEPP et al
as 1:2021cv00772
Defendant:
MOORE, A. KOHLHEPP, HOBGOOD and others
Plaintiff:
RILEY L. CLOSSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
