Cases 1 - 10 of 55
Wolfford v. Hyland, III
as 9:2024cv00087
Plaintiff:
Nickolas Wolfford
Defendant:
James Hyland, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sterling #603436 v. Vanbuskirk et al
as 1:2022cv01057
Plaintiff:
Hyland Steven Sterling #603436
Defendant:
Unknown Vanbuskirk, Unknown Parker and Unknown Sperling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hylander v. Warden, FCI Jesup
as 2:2022cv00044
Petitioner:
Phillip Hylander
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Jesup
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hyland v. Lumpkin
as 22-40299
Petitioner / Appellant:
Richard Allen Hyland
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Bradley, Brandon v. Barth, TJ et al
as 3:2022cv00030
Plaintiff:
Brandon D. Bradley, Sr.
Defendant:
Dep TJ Barth, Dep Shotliff, Dep John Doe and others
Not Classified By Court:
GBCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradley, Brandon v. Moore et al
as 3:2021cv00674
Plaintiff:
Brandon D. Bradley, Sr.
Defendant:
Sgt Moore, Dep Shotliff, Nurse Taylor and others
Not Classified By Court:
DCI Prison Facility and GBCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bradley, Brandon v. Carr, Kevin et al
as 3:2021cv00645
Plaintiff:
Brandon D. Bradley, Sr.
Defendant:
Kevin Carr, Gov Tony Evers, Sheriff Barrett and others
Not Classified By Court:
DCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hyland v. Lumpkin
as 2:2021cv00135
Petitioner:
Richard Allen Hyland
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hyland v. Divris
as 4:2021cv40037
Respondent:
Matthew Divris
Petitioner:
Stephen Hyland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones v. D.O.C.C.S. et al
as 1:2020cv01682
Defendant:
Lowerre, D.O.C.C.S., Officer Killinger and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
