Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Armada v. Healy
as 3:2023cv01348
Petitioner:
Aurelio Seoane Armada
Respondent:
Warden Ian M. Healy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
DOUGHERTY v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE et al
as 3:2022cv00212
Petitioner:
IAN M. DOUGHERTY
Respondent:
PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, SUPERINTENDANT SCOTT KLINEFELTER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Maze v. Oliver et al
as 1:2022cv00456
Petitioner:
Brandon Jalon Maze
Respondent:
Lonnie Oliver, Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office, Matthew Fogal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harton v. Board et al
as 2:2021cv00678
Plaintiff:
Paul M. Harton
Defendant:
Matthew E. Board, Daniel W. Miller, Todd J. Lambiotte and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RUSSELL v. STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 3:2017cv02386
Plaintiff:
IAN M. RUSSELL
Defendant:
State of Pennsylvania, SCI-Smithfield, Eric Tice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RUSSELL v. STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2017cv05476
Plaintiff:
IAN M. RUSSELL
Defendant:
STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, SCI-SMITHFIELD, ERIC TICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOWENS v. USA
as 1:2017cv00136
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
IAN M BOWENS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
RUSSELL v. KAUFFMAN et al
as 2:2017cv00565
Petitioner:
IAN M. RUSSELL
Respondent:
KAUFFMAN, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hall v. Frieden et al
as 5:2014cv03009
Plaintiff:
Delano E. Hall
Defendant:
Timothy Frieden and Ian M. Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doty v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2011cv00424
Plaintiff:
Ian M. Doty
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
