Cases 1 - 10 of 249
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv11300
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
IBRAHIM v. EMRICH et al
as 3:2024cv01780
Plaintiff:
YUSUF IBRAHIM
Defendant:
AMY EMRICH and DERRICK BODTMANN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Lemke v. Skinner et al
as 4:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Sean Michael Lemke and Angel Marie
Defendant:
Beth Skinner, Jerome Greenfield, Nichole Francis and others
Interested Party:
H. Loraine Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grant Anderson v. Maryland Attorney General
as 23-7273
Petitioner / Appellant:
GRANT ANDERSON, a/k/a Jibril Luqman Ibrahim
Respondent / Appellee:
MARYLAND ATTORNEY GENERAL
Thomas v. Traficanti et al.
as 4:2023cv02286
Plaintiff:
Marquez Thomas
Defendant:
Anthony Traficanti, David Ditzler, Coral Rimedio-Righetti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Al Sormeeri v. Choate
as 1:2023cv03121
Petitioner:
Waseem Hasan Ibrahim Al Sormeeri
Respondent:
J. Choate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in - Habeas Corpus: INS
Robinson v. County of Mahoning et al.
as 4:2023cv02251
Plaintiff:
Monty Robinson
Defendant:
County of Mahoning, D. Ditzler, C. Righettetti-Rimedio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ibrahim v. Drake et al
as 2:2023cv01755
Plaintiff:
Adan Yusuf Ibrahim
Defendant:
Drake, Edmond, Porter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mohamed Ibrahim v. Jenny Hildebrand
as 23-3916
Petitioner / Appellant:
MOHAMED IBRAHIM
Respondent / Appellee:
JENNY HILDEBRAND, Warden
Hanif (PS) v. Colorado Springs Police Department et al
as 1:2023cv02929
Plaintiff:
Ibrahim Hanif
Defendant:
Colorado Springs Police Department and Colorado Attorny General
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
