Cases 1 - 10 of 59
Price v. Burke
as 0:2024cv01409
Plaintiff:
Paul Vincent Price
Defendant:
George J. Burke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Walker v. Town of Woodbury et al
as 7:2023cv06363
Plaintiff:
Darrell Walker
Defendant:
Town of Woodbury, TOWN SUPERVISOR Thomas J. Burke, COUNCILMEMBER KATHRYN LUCIANI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bailey-Bey v. Mosby et al
as 1:2022cv02778
Plaintiff:
Ari Bailey-Bey
Defendant:
Marilyn Mosby, J. Burke Miller and Charles Maoners
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Management Training Corp. et al
as 5:2022cv00081
Plaintiff:
Raymond Kieth Thomas
Defendant:
Management Training Corp., VitaCore Medical Co., J Burkes and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perkins v. ARD et al
as 5:2021cv00079
Plaintiff:
Melvin L. Perkins
Defendant:
Domonic ARD, J. Burke, Unknown Perkins and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holloway v. Middlebrooks et al
as 5:2021cv00063
Plaintiff:
Jason Holloway
Defendant:
Warden Scott Middlebrooks, Doctor J. Burke, St. Jose Julian and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crenshaw v. Vidal et al
as 3:2021cv50149
Defendant:
J. J., Thomas A. Lilien, Joseph McGraw and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Patrick Crenshaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perkins v. Burke et al
as 5:2020cv00194
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Dr. J. Burke, Unknown Warden of Security, Unknown Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Melvin L. Perkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowell v. Nguyen et al
as 3:2020cv00616
Defendant:
E. Nguyen, R.A. Barenchi, M.D., Dr Martin and others
Plaintiff:
James Bowell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Burkes v. USA
as 6:2020cv00163
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Rashundria J Burkes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
