Cases 1 - 10 of 53
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00182
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nelson et al v. Wapinsky et al
as 1:2023cv02076
Plaintiff:
Russell J. Nelson, Dustin Oncay, Matthew Creveling and others
Defendant:
Warden David Wapinsky, Deputy Warden Mike Buchanan, Captain John Bowman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nickens #316282 v. Jones et al
as 1:2023cv00815
Plaintiff:
Arthur S. Nickens #316282, III
Defendant:
M. Jones, J. Nelson, Unknown Stump and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LEE v. JOSEPH et al
as 1:2023cv00447
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM LEE
Defendant:
SAMMIE JOSEPH, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS (IDOC), R. CARTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nelson v. Worthy et al
as 2:2022cv11195
Plaintiff:
Wayne J. Nelson
Defendant:
Kym Worthy, Mike Duggan, Commissioner of Detroit Wayne County and others
Parks et al v. Murray et al
as 6:2022cv06020
Plaintiff:
Lavon D. Parks, Ronnie Lambert, Walter S. Duprey and others
Defendant:
CO Murray, CO Timothy Gilmore, CO Hanson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watters v. Free et al
as 2:2021cv00687
Defendant:
CO Martinez, Z Bergh, Lt Halasi and others
Plaintiff:
Barry Lynn Watters, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alvarado v. Birdyshaw et al
as 2:2021cv00189
Defendant:
Fisher, Jesse Jones, Dingman and others
Plaintiff:
Ramon Alvarado, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelson v. United States of America
as 4:2020cv04154
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Delrico J Nelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
McClellan v. Nelson
as 9:2020cv00990
Plaintiff:
James A McClellan and James Anderson McClellan
Defendant:
Kenneth J Nelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
