Cases 1 - 10 of 34
OWENS v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 1:2020cv00369
Petitioner:
LQ5286 JAMES JOSEPH OWENS and JAMES JOSEPH OWENS
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PENNSYLVANIA, PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wright-El v. Thomas et al
as 1:2019cv05623
Petitioner:
Cush Ajelya Wright-El and James Joseph Owens-El
Respondent:
Mathew A. Sciarrino, Jr., Mr. Thomas, State of New York and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Owens v. Mousaw et al
as 6:2019cv06204
Defendant:
S M Cronin, A C Mousaw and B J Anderson
Plaintiff:
James Lee Owens, Jr,
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Owens v. Johnson, et al
as 3:2018cv00431
Plaintiff:
James H Owens, Jr
Defendant:
Larry Martin, Theresa Johnson and David Ray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Owens v. Ray et al
as 3:2018cv00408
Plaintiff:
James H Owens, Jr
Defendant:
Rhonda Venable, Don Bryant and David Ray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv03057
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-7843
Petitioner - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Owens v. Smith
as 1:2015cv00074
Petitioner:
James Ricky Owens
Respondent:
Aaron Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Victor Rodriguez v. Samuel Salus, et al
as 15-2142
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VICTOR MANUEL RODRIGUEZ, on his own Behalf
Defendant - Appellee:
SAMUEL SALUS, Judge, Court of Common Pleas for Montgomery County, Pennsylvania, Norristown, PA, JOSEPH P. MASCARO, District Attorney for Montgomery County, Pennsylvania, MARY FITIPALDI, District Attorney for Montgomery County, Pennsylvania, Norristown, PA and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00209
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
