Cases 1 - 9 of 9
BRISCOE v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2023cv02714
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM BRISCOE
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JOHN MCLAUGHLIN, MICHAEL P, FENERTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robert Bailey v. Stig Larson
as 17-7339
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
STIG LARSON, FAYETTEVILLE NORTH CAROLINA POLICE DEPARTMENT, UNKNOWN LT SUPERVISOR and others
Long v. Annucci et al
as 9:2017cv00916
Plaintiff:
Vincent S. Long
Defendant:
Anthony J. Annucci, N. Doldo, M. Montroy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Praileau v. McLaughlin
as 13-994
Plaintiff - Appellant:
William Praileau
Defendant - Appellee:
John McLaughlin, Deputy Superintendent of programs at Cape Vincent Correctional Facility, Peter Hills, Correctional Officer at Cape Vincent Correctional Facility, Patricia Recor, Guidance Counselor, Cape Vincent Correctional Facility and others
Perales et al v. United States Internal Revenue Service et al
as 1:2011cv02172
Petitioner:
Azael Dythian Perales
Respondent:
United States Internal Revenue Service, USA, U.S. Federal Bureau Of Investigation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Praileau v. McLaughlin et al
as 9:2010cv01051
Plaintiff:
William Praileau
Defendant:
John McLaughlin, Peter Hills, Patricia Recor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McLaughlin v. Ryan et al
as 2:2010cv01142
Petitioner:
Jason John McLaughlin
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Fowlkes v. St. Peters et al
as 1:2009cv10260
Plaintiff:
Felipe Oteze Fowlkes
Defendant:
St. Peters, Murphy, Forrest and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Schofield v. Dickhaut et al
as 1:2008cv12025
Plaintiff:
Eugene Schofield
Defendant:
Thomas E. Dickhaut, Anthony Mendorsa, John McLaughlin and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
