Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Hernandez v. Gutierrez et al
as 5:2024cv00279
Plaintiff:
Jose Flores Hernandez
Defendant:
David G. Gutierrez, Eric J.R. Nichols, Governor Greg Abbott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernandez v. Hernandez et al
as 5:2023cv01564
Plaintiff:
Jose Flores Hernandez
Defendant:
Moses Flores Hernandez, Moses Villegas Hernandez and Phil Bernal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernandez v. Hernandez et al
as 2:2023cv00613
Plaintiff:
Jose Flores Hernandez
Defendant:
Moses Flores Hernandez, Moses Villegas Hernandez and Phil Bernal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernandez v. Lumpkin
as 5:2022cv01244
Petitioner:
Jose Flores Hernandez
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Flores-Solorio v. State of Washington
as 2:2021cv00051
Respondent:
State of Washington
Petitioner:
Jose Flores-Solorio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Flores-Solorio v. State of Washington
as 2:2021cv00009
Respondent:
State of Washington
Petitioner:
Jose Flores-Solorio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Flores v. Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2020cv10122
Plaintiff:
Flores Jose and Jose Flores
Defendant:
Marget Egan, Department of Corrections, Cynthania Brann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FLORES-MEDINA v. KAUFFMAN et al
as 5:2020cv05712
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF LANCASTER and KEVIN KAUFFMAN
Petitioner:
JOSE FLORES-MEDINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Flores Hernandez v. Lumpkin
as 5:2020cv01298
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Petitioner:
Jose Flores Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Patton v. Mesa, City of et al
as 2:2020cv01685
Defendant:
Blain Rogers, Unknown Braley, Unknown Batista and others
Plaintiff:
Bernard A Patton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
