Cases 1 - 10 of 98
Wilson v. State of Montana
as 1:2024cv00048
Petitioner:
James Ronald Wilson
Respondent:
State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
James Wilson v. Donald Emerson
as 23-2953
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMES G. WILSON
Respondent / Appellee:
DONALD EMERSON, Warden
James Wilson v. Donald Emerson
as 23-2751
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMES G. WILSON
Respondent / Appellee:
DONALD EMERSON, Warden
WILSON v. WARDEN
as 1:2023cv00486
Petitioner:
JAMES E. WILSON
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilson v. Texas Department Of Criminal Justice
as 2:2023cv00055
Petitioner:
James Dean Wilson
Respondent:
Texas Department Of Criminal Justice and Bobby Lumpkin, Director, TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
James Wilson v. Bludsworth, et al
as 22-35845
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMES RONALD WILSON
Respondent / Appellee:
BLUDSWORTH and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF MONTANA
Wilson v. FCI Berlin, Warden
as 1:2022cv00429
Petitioner:
James Alonzo Wilson
Respondent:
FCI Berlin, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Alonsa et al v. Wilcher
as 4:2022cv00214
Plaintiff:
Humberto Mendez Alonsa, Jose Torres Gomez, James Blige and others
Defendant:
Sheriff John T. Wilcher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. City of Meridian Police Department et al
as 3:2022cv00443
Plaintiff:
James Phillip Wilson
Defendant:
City of Meridian Police Department and John Doe 1
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson, Jr. v. Bergami et al
as 3:2022cv50200
Petitioner:
James Earl Wilson, Jr.
Respondent:
Bergami, Gonziles, Jr., Thomas Bergami and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
