Cases 1 - 10 of 21
CARLTON v. DEWITT et al
as 5:2022cv00291
Plaintiff:
JAMES CARLTON
Defendant:
CERT OFFICER DEWITT, UNIT MANAGER WILCOX and GEORGIA DIAGNOSTIC CLASSIFICATION PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tarkington v. Burl et al
as 5:2016cv00324
Plaintiff:
Johnny Tarkington
Defendant:
Danny Burl, Carl E Stout, Kirk J Sterling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hall v. Bentley et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2015cv00689
Plaintiff:
Jason Jermaine Hall
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Cam Ward, Mike Hubbard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. Thomas, et al. (INMATE 2)
as 2:2014cv00439
Plaintiff:
Michael James Baker
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas, Christopher Gordy, Luther Strange and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keiss v. Thomas et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2014cv00062
Plaintiff:
Christopher M. Keiss
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas, Christopher Gordy and James Carlton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keiss v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2013cv00951
Plaintiff:
Christopher M. Keiss
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Christopher Gordy, James Carlton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
West v. Gordy et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2013cv00808
Plaintiff:
James Michael West, Jr.
Defendant:
Christopher Gordy, James Carlton and Sherwood Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pickett v. Thomas et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2013cv00091
Plaintiff:
Joe Ranger Pickett
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas, James Carlton, Christopher Gordon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Carlton et al (INMATE 3)
as 1:2012cv01063
Plaintiff:
Deangelo Johnson
Defendant:
James Carlton and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Posey v. Giles et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2012cv00906
Plaintiff:
Steve A. Posey
Defendant:
J. C. Giles, James Carlton, Cedrick Specks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
