Cases 1 - 10 of 45
White v. Collier et al
as 4:2024cv00826
Plaintiff:
William Dexter White and George Edward Tustin, Jr
Defendant:
Bryan Collier, C.F. Hazelwood, Garthe Parker and others
Interested Party:
Joseph J Genovesi and Jason David Sheedy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Redd et al
as 7:2023cv00648
Plaintiff:
Darrell Jason David Harris
Defendant:
Cpt. Kelly Redd, Wayne Davis and Dr. Spencer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sheedy v. Thompson et al
as 4:2022cv02853
Plaintiff:
Jason David Sheedy
Defendant:
Lashea Thompson, Lasisi Sule, George Okoro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Monaco v. John Doe (1) et al
as 2:2022cv02888
Plaintiff:
Jason David Monaco
Defendant:
John Doe (1), John Doe (2), John Doe (3) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Messenger v. King
as 2:2022cv11421
Petitioner:
Jason David Messenger
Respondent:
Warden Chris King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harris v. Amherst County Adult Detention Center
as 7:2022cv00032
Plaintiff:
Darrell Jason David Harris
Defendant:
Amherst County Adult Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv07603
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Streeval et al
as 7:2021cv00122
Respondent:
D. Snodgrass and J.C. Streeval
Petitioner:
Jason David Young, Chris, Bird and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Speed v. Sollie et al
as 3:2020cv00749
Plaintiff:
Jason David Speed
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Billy Sollie and Lauderdale County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. USA - 2255
as 1:2020cv01779
Petitioner:
Jason David Young
Respondent:
USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
