Cases 1 - 10 of 673
Marshall v. Riley et al (INMATE 2)
as 3:2024cv00670
Plaintiff:
John Marshall
Defendant:
Austin Billingsley, Cody Williams, Leonard Riley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sosa v. Mass. DOC, et al
as 24-1433
Plaintiff:
CHE BLAKE SOSA
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, JAMES J. SABA, former Superintendent, MCI Cedar Junction, in his official and individual capacities, LUIS S. SPENCER, former Commissioner of the Department of Correction, in his official and individual capacities and others
Hail et al v. WMD Sites et al
as 3:2021cv00531
Defendant:
Disability Division, N. Pelosi, Brandon Breslow and others
Plaintiff:
R. Lee, L. Hail Mackle, M.J. Christian Hail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Trammell et al
as 1:2021cv00495
Respondent:
Marcus Johnson, Michael L. Wade, John Marshall and others
Petitioner:
Daniel James Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
James El v. Trammell et al
as 1:2021cv00462
Defendant:
John Marshall, Bonita R Comer, Michael L. Wade and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel James El
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Underwood v. Beard et al
as 0:2021cv00033
Defendant:
Amos, Isaacs, Maza and others
Plaintiff:
John Marshall Underwood, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Underwood v. USA
as 0:2021cv00017
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
John Marshall Underwood, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Underwood v. Beard et al
as 0:2021cv00010
Defendant:
Andrew R. Wheeler, CPT Camacho, Allen Beard and others
Plaintiff:
John Marshall Underwood, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Underwood v. United States District of Kentucky
as 0:2021cv00007
Plaintiff:
John Marshall Underwood, Jr.
Defendant:
United States District of Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02349
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
