Cases 1 - 10 of 85
Jones v. State of Louisiana, et al
as 3:2024cv00363
Plaintiff:
Jerome Jones
Defendant:
Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections, Joseph Davis, Gabriel Hebert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) McDowell v. Smith et al
as 1:2024cv00500
Plaintiff:
Giovanni McDowell
Defendant:
Steve Smith, Jeffrey Storey, Joseph Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Armstrong
as 7:2023cv00686
Plaintiff:
Christopher Joseph Davis
Defendant:
Deputy B. A. Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. GIBBS et al
as 5:2023cv00169
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY JOSEPH DAVIS
Defendant:
RICHARD LEE GIBBS, BATCHELOR, MURRAY WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Jones et al
as 3:2022cv05219
Plaintiff:
Joseph Davis
Defendant:
Ricky Jones, Town of Saint Joseph, Tensas Parish Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Claussan et al
as 3:2022cv00186
Plaintiff:
Michael Joseph Davis
Defendant:
Brian Claussan, Matt Matthews and Shannon Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turley v. City of South Charleston et al
as 2:2022cv00249
Plaintiff:
Jamie Brian Turley
Defendant:
The City of South Charleston, Justin Bailes, Aaron Chapman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. State of Alaska
as 3:2022cv00116
Petitioner:
Michael Joseph Davis
Defendant:
State of Alaska
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Davis v. State of Alaska
as 3:2022cv00073
Petitioner:
Michael Joseph Davis, Jr.
Respondent:
State of Alaska
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DAVIS v. CAPE MAY COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2021cv20120
Plaintiff:
EDWARD JOSEPH DAVIS
Defendant:
CAPE MAY COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
