Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Griffin v. MTC-Mgmt Training
as 23-60081
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Joseph Griffin
Defendant / Appellee:
MTC-Management Training and Corporation
Griffin v. USA
as 3:2022cv01532
Petitioner:
Joseph Griffin
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Lay, et al v. Crow, et al
as 22-6112
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WADE LAY, by and through his next friend Rhonda Kemp
Plaintiff:
BRENDA E. ANDREW, RONSON KYLE BUSH, JEMAINE MONTEIL CANNON and others
Defendant / Appellee:
SCOTT CROW, RANDY CHANDLER, BETTY GESELL and others
Coddington, et al v. Crow, et al
as 22-6100
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES A. CODDINGTON, BENJAMIN R. COLE, CARLOS CUESTA-RODRIGUEZ and others
Defendant / Appellee:
SCOTT CROW, RANDY CHANDLER, BETTY GESELL and others
Grant, et al v. Crow, et al
as 22-6012
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONALD ANTHONY GRANT and GILBERT RAY POSTELLE
Plaintiff:
JAMES A. CODDINGTON, BENJAMIN R. COLE, CARLOS CUESTA-RODRIGUEZ and others
Defendant / Appellee:
SCOTT CROW, RANDY CHANDLER, BETTY GESELL and others
Griffin v. Jackson et al
as 3:2021cv00400
Plaintiff:
Joseph Griffin
Defendant:
Michael Jackson, State of Mississippi and MTC-Management training and Corporation
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRIFFIN-COOKE v. KRUEGER
as 2:2018cv00392
Respondent:
J. E. KRUEGER
Petitioner:
JOSEPH GRIFFIN-COOKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
WILKERSON v. JONES et al.
as 3:2017cv00418
Plaintiff:
JEROME B WILKERSON
Defendant:
JULIE JONES, CHAD THOMPSON, JOSEPH GRIFFIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Griffin v. USA
as 3:2016cv00957
Petitioner:
Joseph Griffin
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Griffin-Cooke v. USA
as 1:2016cv00031
Defendant:
USA
Plaintiff:
Joseph Griffin-Cooke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
