Cases 1 - 10 of 53
Lewis v. Babb
as 3:2024cv00041
Petitioner:
Joshua Allen Lewis
Respondent:
Babb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McBerry v. Brown et al
as 1:2023cv03967
Plaintiff:
Joshua Allen McBerry
Defendant:
Sheriff Ezell Brown, Newton County Sheriffs Office, Newton County Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MEDCALF v. BREWER
as 2:2023cv00299
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA ALLEN MEDCALF
Defendant:
R. BREWER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joshua Sinclair v. Tyler Blewett, et al
as 23-35255
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSHUA ALLEN SINCLAIR
Defendant / Appellee:
TYLER BLEWETT, HODNEY, Religious Services Chaplain, STUART YOUNG, Assistant Administrator of Religious Services and others
Medcalf v. Brewer
as 3:2023cv00252
Plaintiff:
Joshua Allen Medcalf
Defendant:
R Brewer
Not Classified By Court:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joshua Sinclair v. Tyler Blewett, et al
as 22-35491
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSHUA ALLEN SINCLAIR
Defendant / Appellee:
TYLER BLEWETT, HODNEY, Religious Services Chaplain, STUART YOUNG, Assistant Administrator of Religious Services and others
Cabanaw v. Aramark Food Service et al
as 3:2022cv00305
Plaintiff:
Joshua Allen Cabanaw
Defendant:
Aramark Food Service, Olmstead and Michael Shapiro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bausch v. Sullivan et al
as 4:2022cv04026
Petitioner:
Joshua Allen Bausch
Respondent:
Daniel Sullivan and The Attorney General of the State of South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BOLEN v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
as 1:2021cv00897
Petitioner:
JOSHUA ALLEN BOLEN
Respondent:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Morris v. Dicus et al
as 1:2021cv00151
Plaintiff:
Joshua Allen Lee Morris
Defendant:
Kenneth Ryan Dicus and Nicholas Jain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
