Cases 1 - 10 of 109
K.D.H. v. Boone County, Missouri et al
as 2:2024cv04084
Plaintiff:
K. D. H.
Defendant:
Boone County, Missouri, Daymon Reynolds, Christie McCalebb and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
MURZIKE v. CARR et al
as 3:2024cv00211
Plaintiff:
JAMES T. MURZIKE
Defendant:
J E CARR, T DYKES, C W CATTNACH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Durwin Bonds, Jr. v. Chadwick Dotson
as 24-6151
Plaintiff:
DURWIN EVANT BONDS, JR.
Defendant:
CHADWICK DOTSON, Director VA Dept. of Corrections, RICK WHITE, Warden of Red Onion State Prison, K. ALMARADE, Food Service ROSP and others
(PC) Perkins v. California Correctional Health Care Services et al
as 1:2023cv01607
Plaintiff:
Gary Ronnell Perkins
Defendant:
California Correctional Health Care Services, Judith Holmes, Wei Gu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunnicutt v. Peters, et al
as 22-2053
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARNELL HUNNICUTT, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
DANIEL PETERS, Warden, WILLIAM EDGMAN, Deputy Warden, ESTEVAN FLORES and others
GELB v. SANTIAGO et al
as 3:2022cv05237
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN G GELB
Defendant:
J SANTIAGO and K D LANE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Ramey et al
as 7:2021cv00348
Defendant:
A. Duncan, Fleming, #1 Doe Rose and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Kenzell Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Ruiz v. Mendez et al
as 2:2021cv00860
Plaintiff:
Rogelio May Ruiz
Defendant:
C. K. D. and John A. Mendez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crear v. Jones et al
as 1:2020cv01410
Defendant:
H Jones, C O Weinstein and Ulatoski
Plaintiff:
Keith Morris Crear, Mike Jones and K D
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
(PC) Millare v. Starr et al
as 2:2020cv02072
Defendant:
A. Ortega-Schafer, Kelly Conner Hall, L. Bird and others
Plaintiff:
Moriano Millare
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
