Cases 1 - 10 of 11
(PC) Urmancheev v. Ndoh, et al.
as 1:2021cv00255
Defendant:
R. Ndoh, P. Vera, K. Donaldson and others
Plaintiff:
Alim S. Urmancheev
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vazquez v. Kamen et al
as 2:2017cv01679
Plaintiff:
Juan R. Vazquez
Defendant:
Geoffrey Kamen, E. Conannan, Nancy Siegrist and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vazquez v. Kamen et al
as 1:2017cv01138
Plaintiff:
Juan R. Vazquez
Defendant:
Geoffrey Kamen, E. Conannan, Nancy Siegrist and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Timms v. Taylor et al
as 5:2013ct03260
Plaintiff:
Gerald Wayne Timms
Defendant:
Andre Taylor, Andres E. Hernandez, M. Malterer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Boyd v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2011cv00828
Plaintiff:
Donald E Boyd
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Maricopa, County of, Maricopa County Prosecutor's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Donald Boyd v. State of AZ, et al
as 10-4536
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD E. BOYD
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF AZ, MARICOPA CTY AZ, MARICOPA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE and others
Defendant - Appellant:
MARICOPA CTY PROSECUTORS OFFICE
Boyd v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2010cv02554
Plaintiff:
Donald E Boyd
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Maricopa, County of, Maricopa County Prosecutor's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Timms v. True et al
as 5:2009hc02101
Petitioner:
Gerald Wayne Timms
Respondent:
William True, Andre Taylor, Linda Goode and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Richard Brillhart v. US
as 08-7851
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD EDWARD BRILLHART
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - None:
K. DONALDSON
BOYD v. STATE OF ARIZONA et al
as 2:2008cv04521
Plaintiff:
DONALD E. BOYD
Defendant:
STATE OF ARIZONA, MARICOPA COUNTY, AZ, MARICOPA COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
