Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Kevin Bure v. C. Gann, et al
as 24-1990
Plaintiff:
KEVIN J. BURE
Defendant:
C. GANN, ERIN WILLIAMS, JASON SMILEY, Warden and others
Bure v. Gann et al
as 3:2024cv00362
Plaintiff:
Kevin James Bure
Defendant:
C Gann, Erin Williams, Smiley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reed v. Pamunkey Jail et al
as 3:2022cv00551
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Reed
Defendant:
Pamunkey Jail, James Willett, Lt. Bishop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Duchatellier v. Lewis et al
as 3:2020cv00526
Defendant:
Marty Sexton, Dorothy Livers, Michelle Rebac and others
Plaintiff:
Marc Duchatellier, Marcus Duchatellier and Marc D Duchatellier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scroggin v. Davis et al
as 3:2020cv00626
Defendant:
Labarski, Shawna Brown, Motsenhagen and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lee Scroggin
Not Classified By Court:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scroggin v. Galipeau
as 3:2020cv00441
Defendant:
Angenea Williams, Jessica Alvarez Statham, Motsenhagen and others
Not Classified By Court:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lee Scroggin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Lewis et al
as 3:2020cv00420
Defendant:
Marty Sexton, Davis, Freyek and others
Plaintiff:
Devontae C Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reed v. Andrews
as 5:2019hc02065
Respondent:
Warden Justin Andrews
Petitioner:
Kenneth Reed, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Reed v. Marshall Attorney General of Alabama et al
as 4:2018cv01790
Respondent:
Steve Marshall and Marshall Attorney General of Alabama
Petitioner:
Kenneth Reed
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johns v. Corrections Medicine et al
as 4:2018cv00415
Plaintiff:
Brent J. Johns
Defendant:
Corrections Medicine, St. Louis County Jail Administration, Unknown Dentist and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
