Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Petty, Daniel v. Mayson et al
as 3:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
Daniel Rhymes Petty
Defendant:
Sgt. Mayson, C.O. D. Johnson, C.O. Kaczmarek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moody v. Kaczmrek et al.
as 3:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Ryan O. Moody
Defendant:
Officer Nathan Kaczmarek, City of Toledo/Toledo Police Department, Manahan Group Home and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kaczmarek v. USA
as 1:2022cv13152
Petitioner:
Christopher Michael Kaczmarek
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Mitchell v. Shimek et al
as 2:2022cv01461
Plaintiff:
Kristopher DeWitt Mitchell
Defendant:
Peter Shimek, Jonathan Bussie, Sgt Kohlhoff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. White et al
as 6:2022cv06093
Plaintiff:
Randy Williams
Defendant:
Sean P. White, Michael A. Hill, Gary A. Spengler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kaczmarek v. Butler
as 4:2021cv04054
Plaintiff:
Edwin Jacob Kaczmarek
Defendant:
Officer Zane Butler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dickerson v. Whelan
as 2:2019cv00178
Defendant:
MSDF Record Office, Jane Doe, Jane/John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Travis Dickerson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Conway
as 17-3317
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Joseph Jackson
Defendant - Appellee:
C. Monin, Correction Officer and Wagner, Correction Officer
Defendant:
James T. Conway, Superintendent, Mark Bradt, Superintendent, D. O'Connell, Sergeant and others
Whitehurst v. Lackawanna County et al
as 3:2017cv00903
Plaintiff:
Amir Whitehurst
Defendant:
Lackawanna County , Patrick O'Malley , James Wansacz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ronald S. Kaczmarek v. Los Angeles County Probation Department
as 5:2017cv00832
Petitioner:
Ronald S. Kaczmarek
Defendant:
Los Angeles County Probation Department
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
