Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Daniels v. State of Connecticut et al
as 3:2024cv00582
Plaintiff:
Raeshon Kenneth Daniels
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, Dept. of Correction, Osborn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniels v. Warden FCI Ashland
as 0:2024cv00039
Petitioner:
Kenneth Daniels
Respondent:
Warden FCI Ashland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Thompson v. DeWine et al
as 2:2023cv03930
Plaintiff:
Arthur Vernell Thompson
Defendant:
Mike DeWine, James Haviland, Larry Bodell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kenneth Daniels v. David LeMaster
as 22-5189
Petitioner / Appellant:
KENNETH DANIELS
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID LEMASTER, Warden
Daniels v. Warden, FCI Ashland
as 0:2022cv00009
Petitioner:
Kenneth Daniels
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Ashland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MULLIS v. MERRITT
as 3:2021cv01782
Plaintiff:
KENNETH DANIEL MULLIS
Defendant:
SAMANTHA MERRITT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniels v. Ishee et al
as 5:2020ct03327
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Daniels
Defendant:
J. Sapper, Todd E. Ishee and Recardo Hardisson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. City of Las Cruces et al
as 1:2019cv00767
Defendant:
Officer R Lattura, Thomas Medina, Third Judicial District Court and others
Plaintiff:
Charles B Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tiedemann v. Mitchell et al
as 4:2017cv00597
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Daniel Tiedemann
Defendant:
Mary M Mitchell, JT Shartle and Rafael Zuniga
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Brown v. Las Cruces Police Department, City of et al
as 2:2017cv00944
Plaintiff:
Davalous Jamon Brown
Defendant:
Las Cruces Police Department, City of , Dona Ana County Sheriff Department , Dona Ana County Detention Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
