Cases 1 - 10 of 174
McKinney v. United States of America (INMATE 3) (MEMBER)
as 2:2023cv00595
Plaintiff:
Kilpatrick Cornelius McKinney
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
McKinney v. United States of America (INMATE 3) (LEAD)
as 2:2023cv00539
Plaintiff:
Kilpatrick Cornelius McKinney
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Shabazz v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2023cv03005
Plaintiff:
Malik Shabazz
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, Letoya Hughes, Debbie Issacs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flowers v. Meeks et al
as 4:2023cv00131
Plaintiff:
Raphael Flowers
Defendant:
Laquita Meeks, Nurse Stewart, K9 Officer Winter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Kilpatrick v. Coleman et al
as 1:2023cv02614
Petitioner:
Adrian Kilpatrick
Respondent:
Warden Coleman and Ware State Prison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Simmons v. Kilpatrick et al
as 1:2023cv00081
Defendant:
FNU Erizona, Sean C Kilpatrick, Sgt. E and others
Plaintiff:
Devin Simmons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00041
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kilpatrick v. Warden Odum
as 1:2022cv04927
Petitioner:
Adrian Kilpatrick
Respondent:
Warden Odum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Colton Rickels v. D. Leu
as 22-7134
Plaintiff / Appellant:
COLTON RICKELS
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN D. LEU, T. KILPATRICK, D. DAVIS and others
Brown v. Wilson et al
as 1:2022cv00363
Plaintiff:
Micah Brown
Defendant:
R. Wilson, D. Smith, Kilpatrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
