Cases 1 - 10 of 72
Rosado v. Langdon et al
as 1:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Luis Antonio Rosado, Jr.
Defendant:
FNU Langdon, Cindy Hayes, Kevin Freeman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Williams, Jr. v. Edward Spagel, et al
as 24-1503
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BRUCE WILLIAMS, JR.
Defendant:
EDWARD J. SPAGEL, JR., PETER DREGALLA, BALESK and others
Debtor:
TAYLOR, CITY OF ERIE POLICE DEPT.
Sofia Cano v. South Carolina Department of Corrections
as 24-6200
Plaintiff:
SOFIA CANO
Defendant:
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, BRYAN P. STIRLING, DR. CHRIS KUNKLE and others
Tate v. Langdon, III
as 1:2024cv00771
Petitioner:
Antonio Emerson Tate
Respondent:
William Langdon, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bowers v. Warden William Langdon, III
as 0:2024cv00287
Petitioner:
David Andrew Bowers
Respondent:
Warden William Langdon, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Macon v. Stirling et al
as 0:2024cv00185
Petitioner:
Arthur William Macon
Respondent:
Bryan Stirling, South Carolina Department of Corrections and William Langdon, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Terron Dizzley v. William Langdon
as 23-7312
Petitioner:
TERRON GERHARD DIZZLEY
Respondent:
WARDEN WILLIAM LANGDON
(PC) TerVeer v. Jones et al
as 2:2023cv03048
Plaintiff:
Justin Ryan TerVeer
Defendant:
Gena Jones, Howard E. Moseley, Brunner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Langdon
as 9:2023cv06377
Petitioner:
Cedric L. Woods
Defendant:
William Langdon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Summers #459083 v. Brown et al
as 1:2023cv01050
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Summers #459083
Defendant:
Ruth Brown, Lynn Parrish, B. Haddon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
