Cases 1 - 10 of 554
Walker v. Thompson et al
as 3:2024cv01311
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Ray Walker
Defendant:
Lowell Thompson, Will Thompson, Andrew Wolf and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BLUE v. ELKINS et al
as 2:2024cv00166
Plaintiff:
JEREMY BLUE
Defendant:
CRYSTAL ELKINS, MIAIAH J. POTWYN, MARK D. SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Messer v. USA
as 5:2024cv00114
Petitioner:
Lowell Thomas Messer, Jr
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
TOWNSEND v. LOWELL et al
as 2:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO D. TOWNSEND
Defendant:
LOWELL, NEFF, HELTERBRAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peterson v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02056
Petitioner:
Lowell Peterson
Respondent:
State of North Carolina and Lauren May
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
MCCRACKEN v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
RICHARD MCCRACKEN
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, CARLA COAKLEY, M. PAYNE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00022
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv12868
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Lowell Quincy Green v. State of Texas Government, et al
as 23-3191
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LOWELL QUINCY GREEN
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF TEXAS, Government, TARRANT COUNTY, MCLENNAN COUNTY and others
Byrnside v. Griffin et al
as 1:2023cv00319
Plaintiff:
Austin Amos Byrnside
Defendant:
Lowell Griffin, Dylan Rollins, Brandon Hemphill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
