Cases 1 - 10 of 730
Hoover v. Act Fast Bail LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
Jason Michael Hoover
Defendant:
Act Fast Bail LLC and Lacy Hubber
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meghan O Malley-Kail et al v. Chad Bianco et al
as 5:2024cv00654
Plaintiff:
Maya Kail, Leah Kail and Meghan O'Malley-Kail
Defendant:
Chad Bianco, Garrett Schultz, Michael Gundry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kevin M. DeHoog v. Theo Lacy
as 8:2024cv00638
Plaintiff:
Kevin M DeHoog
Defendant:
Theo Lacy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davenport v. Baker et al
as 3:2024cv00852
Plaintiff:
Kareem Davenport
Defendant:
Sergeant Baker, C/O Suhro, C/O Schweizer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Honaker v. Rose et al
as 1:2024cv00146
Plaintiff:
Gerald Leon Honaker
Defendant:
Sgt. W. E. Rose, Dep. J. A. Brooks, Dep. M. S. Altice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kevin M. DeHoog v. Theo Lacy Masked Guards
as 8:2024cv00586
Plaintiff:
Kevin M DeHoog
Defendant:
Theo Lacy Masked Guards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lacy v. Villalobos et al
as 4:2024cv00896
Plaintiff:
Antonio Maurice Lacy
Defendant:
Assistant Warden Dana Sullivan, Nurse Practitioner Crystal Mable, UTMB and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lacy v. Commonwealth of Kentucky
as 5:2024cv00065
Petitioner:
Marvell Jermaine Lacy, Jr.
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kevin M. De Hoog v. Masked Guards of Theo Lacy Strip Search
as 8:2024cv00472
Plaintiff:
Kevin M. De Hoog
Defendant:
Masked Guards of Theo Lacy Strip Search
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Florio et al
as 4:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Anthony Hill
Defendant:
John Florio, Carlos Escobedo, Lacy Florio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
