Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Campbell #043669 v. Unknown Party et al
as 2:2023cv01408
Plaintiff:
Ricky Lee Campbell
Defendant:
Unknown Party, Fife Symington, Terry Goddard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campbell v. State of Alabama et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2022cv00562
Plaintiff:
Jason Lee Campbell and Kyle Evan Horvat
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Alabama Department of Corrections, Staton Correctional and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campbell et al v. Alabama, State of et al
as 2:2022cv00976
Plaintiff:
Jason Lee Campbell and Kyle Evan Horvat
Defendant:
Alabama, State of, Alabama Department of Corrections, Staton Correctional and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campbell v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2022hc02019
Petitioner:
David Lee Campbell
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Campbell v. Arizona, State of
as 2:2021cv01802
Petitioner:
Ricky Lee Campbell
Respondent:
Arizona, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Campbell v. Frakes et al
as 8:2019cv00515
Respondent:
Todd Wasmer and Scott R. Frakes
Petitioner:
Herbert Lee Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2019cv00273
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Campbell #043831 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2018cv00798
Petitioner:
Albert Lee Campbell
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Campbell v. Arizona, State of
as 2:2016cv03178
Petitioner:
Rickey Lee Campbell
Respondent:
Arizona, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Campbell v. Arizona, State of
as 2:2016cv02688
Petitioner:
Ricky Lee Campbell
Respondent:
Arizona, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
