Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Vance v. State of Nebraska
as 8:2018cv00278
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Respondent:
State of Nebraska
Petitioner:
Jerimiah Lee Vance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dukes v. Vance et al
as 3:2017cv00901
Plaintiff:
John David Dukes
Defendant:
Lee Vance and Jackson Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vance v. Thomas
as 6:2015cv02042
Petitioner:
Ricky Lee Vance
Respondent:
Linda Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
US v. Ricky Vance
as 14-7153
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RICKY LEE VANCE
Russell Vance v. Ulli Klemm
as 14-1259
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RUSSELL LEE VANCE, a/k/a Abdullah Rasul Shabazz-Allah
Defendant - Appellee:
REV. ULLI KLEMM, Religion Volunteer and Recreational Services Program Administrator, In His Personal and Professional Capacity
Vance v. United States of America
as 6:2012cv02753
Petitioner:
Ricky Lee Vance
Respondent:
Warden of FCI Edgefield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Vance v. Holder et al
as 6:2011cv03460
Plaintiff:
Ricky Lee Vance
Defendant:
Eric H Holder, Jr, Harold Lappin, John Does 1-50 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VANCE v. ALBERT EINSTEIN MEDICAL CENTER
as 2:2010cv02621
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL LEE VANCE
Defendant:
ALBERT EINSTEIN MEDICAL CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VANCE v. THE PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE
as 4:2008cv01185
Plaintiff:
Russell Lee Vance
Defendant:
The Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
VANCE v. THE PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE
as 2:2007cv04973
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL LEE VANCE
Defendant:
THE PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
