Cases 1 - 10 of 75
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02827
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21028
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Ling v. City of New York et al
as 1:2023cv10406
Plaintiff:
Sue Ling
Defendant:
The City Of New York,, John Doe, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sanders v. Purdom et al
as 2:2023cv11413
Plaintiff:
DeJhan Sanders
Defendant:
Purdom, Wesker, Martinez and others
Dyous v. Mental Health and Addiction Services et al
as 3:2022cv01518
Plaintiff:
Anthony Dyous, Ling Xin Wu, Vincenzo Lindia and others
Defendant:
Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services, Whiting Forensic Hospital and Psychiatric Security Review Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Edgar Ling v. Pat Garett
as 22-35469
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDGAR V. LING
Defendant / Appellee:
PAT GARETT, Washington County Sheriff, WASHINGTON COUNTY MEDICAL, NAPH CARE INC. and others
Gomez v. Guevara et al
as 3:2022mc80145
Plaintiff:
Ariel Gomez
Defendant:
REYNALDO GUEVARA, BERSCOTT RUIZ, ALAN PERGANDE and others
Not Classified By Court:
Rowena Ling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01879
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00185
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Ling v. Garett et al
as 3:2022cv00215
Plaintiff:
Edgar V. Ling
Defendant:
Pat Garett, Deputy Hallaway, Washington County Medical and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
