Cases 1 - 10 of 1,467
Harris v. Haymarket Center et al
as 1:2024cv08398
Defendant:
Haymarket Center, Allen Love, Meyer and others
Plaintiff:
Jackie Wayne Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Love v. Gunther
as 2:2024cv02355
Petitioner:
Zachary Joseph Love
Respondent:
Jason Gunther
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Love v. Anderson et al
as 5:2024cv01212
Defendant:
Sgt Anderson and D Darby
Plaintiff:
Carlos Love
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Owens v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Hernando County)
as 8:2024cv02040
Petitioner:
Love Owens, III
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Osuna v. Guerrero, et al.
as 1:2024cv01009
Defendant:
E. Sanchez, A. Guerrero, J. Zimora and others
Plaintiff:
Jamie Osuna
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hoskins v. Thielen et al
as 3:2024cv50354
Defendant:
Dallas Thielen, Renee Stevens, Cotton Love and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Hoskins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rieger v. Howard et al
as 2:2024cv12170
Plaintiff:
Jaime Rieger
Defendant:
Full Love, Walton, Jeremy Howard and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Gay v. Dodd et al
as 5:2024cv05235
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Earl Gay
Defendant:
Attorney Andrew Love, CAP Agency, Attorney Lynne S. Coffin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bailey v. Albright et al
as 6:2024cv00420
Defendant:
F.B.I., Bryan Collier, Judge Alan D Albright and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Bailey and Mar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ponze v. Montana Women's Prison et al
as 1:2024cv00110
Plaintiff:
Natasha Love Ponze
Defendant:
Ben Fry, Dr. MacMurry, C.O. Sincoski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
