Cases 1 - 10 of 181
Sampson v. Dotson et al
as 7:2024cv00615
Defendant:
Yakiia Beckford, Chad Dotson, Andrew Graves and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Eugene Sampson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fields v. Cottrill et al
as 2:2024cv03857
Defendant:
Zanesville Police Department, Mark A Zanghi, Hon. Kelly J. Cottrill and others
Plaintiff:
Gerald D. Fields
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gerald Fields v. Matt Wilhite, et al
as 24-3562
Plaintiff:
GERALD D. FIELDS
Defendant:
DETECTIVE MOORE, Deputy Sherrif, MUSKINGUM COUNTY, OH BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, RON WELCH, Muskingum County, OH Prosecutor and others
Lutz v. Lopez et al
as 1:2024cv01689
Plaintiff:
Shawn Lutz
Defendant:
Joshua Franks and Carla Lopez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lutz v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02082
Petitioner:
Joshua D. Lutz
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gonzalez v. Chappell et al
as 3:2024cv02737
Plaintiff:
Eric L. Gonzalez
Defendant:
Kevin Chappell, Eleanore Adams, Brian Lutz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunt v. Lutz et al
as 2:2024cv02036
Plaintiff:
Tavaris Earl Hunt
Defendant:
Nicole Lutz, Champaign County, Illinois, Dustin Heuerman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mosley v. Nekirtis et al
as 4:2023cv01749
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Mosley
Defendant:
Estelle Nekirtis, P. Cox, Capt. Danzel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fields v. Wilhite et al
as 2:2023cv03755
Plaintiff:
Gerald Fields
Defendant:
Detective Wilhite, Detective Moore, Parole Officer Gaumer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Lutz v. Harold Clarke
as 23-6370
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMES ALLEN LUTZ
Respondent / Appellee:
HAROLD C. CLARKE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
