Cases 1 - 10 of 30
VALDIVIA v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE et al
as 2:2024cv02522
Petitioner:
GERARDO DEJESUS VALDIVIA
Respondent:
PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, SUPERINTENDENT HAINWORTH, SCI-LAUREL HIGHLAND, PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY GENERAL M. HENRY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Henry v. Unknown
as 3:2024cv00380
Plaintiff:
Jamal M. Henry
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henry v. Semple
as 3:2024cv00403
Plaintiff:
Brandon M. Henry and Brandon Henry
Defendant:
Commissioner of Corrections and Scott Semple
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henry v. Gripentrog et al
as 1:2023cv00335
Plaintiff:
Marcus M Henry
Defendant:
Jacob Gripentrog, Megan Leberak, Gwendolyn A Vick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henry v. Yang et al
as 1:2023cv00235
Plaintiff:
Marcus M Henry
Defendant:
CO David Yang and Kathy Lemens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henry v. Hohenstern et al
as 1:2022cv01394
Plaintiff:
Marcus M Henry
Defendant:
Allison Hohenstern, Jessica Hosfelt, Megan Leberak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HENRY v. ATLANTIC COUNTY JUSTICE FACILITY
as 1:2022cv06637
Petitioner:
JAMAL M. HENRY
Respondent:
ATLANTIC COUNTY JUSTICE FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HENRY v. REYNOLDS et al
as 1:2022cv05802
Plaintiff:
JAMAL M. HENRY
Defendant:
WILLIAM E. REYNOLDS, SHELBY SCHEFFLER and RIZWAN BAKHAT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Darrell Smith v. Julie Jones, et al
as 22-12128
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARRELL EUGENE SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
JULIE JONES and M. HENRY
Harris v. Ball et al
as 6:2021cv06157
Plaintiff:
Jay Lloyd Harris
Defendant:
Deputy Warden Richard T. Ball, Director Dexter Payne, Dr. Guy M. Henry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
