Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Hardrick v. Olsen et al
as 2:2024cv10484
Plaintiff:
Bernard Hardrick
Defendant:
A. Olsen, Cathy M Garrett, Shantel Word and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dean v. Saint Louis City P.D.
as 4:2024cv00255
Plaintiff:
Alexandra M. Dean
Defendant:
Saint Louis City P.D., Darnell M. Willis, Edward Miles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hardrick v. Olsen et al
as 5:2024cv00853
Plaintiff:
Bernard A. Hardrick
Defendant:
A. Olsen, Cathy M. Garrett, Shantel Word and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RUMLER v. CENTURION MEDICAL et al
as 2:2023cv00465
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN LEE RUMLER
Defendant:
CENTURION MEDICAL, KIM HOSSON, S. BEDWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hopkins v. Brouwer et al
as 9:2022cv00166
Plaintiff:
Steven Hopkins
Defendant:
Thomas Brouwer, B. Barnett, Charles C. Hudnall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McAllister v. Brouwer et al
as 9:2022cv00164
Plaintiff:
George L. McAllister
Defendant:
Thomas Brouwer, B. Barnett, Charles C. Hudnall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barganski v. Brouwer et al
as 9:2022cv00167
Plaintiff:
Robert Barganski
Defendant:
Thomas Brouwer, B. Barnett, Charles C. Hudnall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fuller v. Brouwer et al
as 9:2022cv00169
Plaintiff:
Donald Fuller
Defendant:
Thomas Brouwer, B. Barnett, Charles C. Hudnall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Burchfield v. Brouwer et al
as 9:2022cv00168
Plaintiff:
Charles Burchfield
Defendant:
Thomas Brouwer, B. Barnett, Charles C. Hudnall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rusk v. Brouwer et al
as 9:2022cv00170
Plaintiff:
Bill Rusk
Defendant:
Thomas Brouwer, B. Barnett, Charles C. Hudnall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
