Cases 1 - 10 of 79
Bryan v. Whitaker, et al
as 5:2023cv05238
Plaintiff:
Donald Steven Bryan
Defendant:
Matthew Whitaker, Officer John Doe 1, Officer John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David King v. Timothy Riley
as 22-6410
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID T. KING, individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of John Telly King
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN TIMOTHY RILEY, ASSOCIATE WARDEN ANDREA THOMPSON, ASSOCIATE WARDEN GARY LANE and others
Vargas v. Whitaker et al
as 3:2021cv00059
Petitioner:
Jesus Corona Vargas
Respondent:
Matthew Whitaker and Stacey N. Stone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Perinparasa v. Barr et al
as 1:2020cv00664
Defendant:
Scott Hassell, Neilson, Matthew Whitaker and others
Plaintiff:
Thambymuththu Perinparasa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mithushan v. Barr et al
as 1:2020cv00602
Defendant:
Scott Hassell, Secretary of Homeland Security, Matthew Whitaker and others
Plaintiff:
Pathmakumar Mithushan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Singh v. Barr et al
as 1:2020cv00567
Defendant:
Scott Hassell, Secretary of Homeland Security, Matthew Whitaker and others
Plaintiff:
Surjit Singh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Papa v. Immigration & Customs Enforcement et al
as 1:2020cv00474
Defendant:
Matthew Whitaker, Secretary U S Dept of Homeland Security, Dept of Homeland Security and others
Plaintiff:
Jallow Papa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Devadas v. Homeland Security et al
as 1:2020cv00370
Plaintiff:
Antony M Devadas
Defendant:
U S Dept of Homeland Security, Matthew Whitaker and Bureau of Immigration & Customs Enforcement
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Al-Naqeb v. Neilsen et al
as 1:2019cv00597
Petitioner:
Belal Al-Naqeb
Respondent:
David Paulk, Matthew Whitaker, Kristien Neilsen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02641
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1151
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
