Cases 1 - 10 of 113
Williams-Clark v. McClelland et al
as 2:2024cv00109
Plaintiff:
Adam Y. Williams-Clark
Defendant:
Chief Judge Troy Russell McClelland and City of Cumming, Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HELENKAMP v. JONES et al
as 2:2023cv02164
Plaintiff:
MALACHI HELENKAMP
Defendant:
M. JONES, J. MCCLELLAND, MS. NOVAS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
MCCLELLAND v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2023cv01924
Petitioner:
DAVID J. MCCLELLAND
Respondent:
MICHAEL ZAKEN, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF WASHINGTON COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McClelland v. Speakman et al
as 8:2023cv01040
Plaintiff:
Daryl McClelland
Defendant:
Sean Speakman and Andrew Powell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BERTOLETTE v. LITTLE et al
as 2:2023cv00330
Plaintiff:
JOHN BERTOLETTE
Defendant:
GEORGE LITTLE, LAUREL HARRY, TABB BICKELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McClelland v. Womack et al
as 1:2022cv00576
Plaintiff:
Chester Joseph McClelland
Defendant:
Jacquely Womack, Frank Saunders, Giden Daniel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McClelland v. State of Ohio et al
as 5:2022cv01928
Petitioner:
Dennis McClelland, II
Respondent:
State of Ohio and John Doe Others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Manuel v. Hanning et al
as 4:2021cv01428
Plaintiff:
Zahmeen Z.W. Manuel
Defendant:
Officer Unknown Hanning, Lt. Unknown Rolland and Capt. Unknown McClelland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NEWMAN v TICE et al
as 3:2021cv00105
Defendant:
RHU JOHN DOE, LT PRITZ, CAPT BOYCE and others
Plaintiff:
DARRYL B. NEWMAN, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
McClelland v. City of Steubenville
as 2:2020cv05331
Defendant:
Michael Hyde and City of Steubenville
Plaintiff:
Montel M. McClelland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
