Cases 1 - 10 of 95
Guerrero et al v. Adams County Colorado et al
as 1:2024cv00855
Plaintiff:
Belynn Guerrero, Terry Martin, Belynn (I) Guerrero and others
Defendant:
Adams County Colorado, Gene Claps, Adams County Board of County Commissioners and others
HIXSON v. FRANKLIN COUNTY JAIL et al
as 3:2023cv00098
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN CHARLES HIXSON
Defendant:
FRANKLIN COUNTY JAIL and DEPUTY MCCURRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MILLER v. FARR et al
as 1:2023cv01324
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY MILLER
Defendant:
CHRIS FARR, AUDRA GREZLACK, MELINDA PIERCE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCurry v. Dalke
as 3:2023cv50240
Plaintiff:
Mattel McCurry
Defendant:
Sgt. Dalke and Lt. Manzano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andrews v. Schumacher et al
as 1:2023cv03634
Plaintiff:
Dashawn Andrews
Defendant:
William Schumacher, Michael Vitale and Matthew McCurry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McCurry v. USA
as 23-40287
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Sylvester McCurry
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America, President Joseph R. Biden, Jr., United States Congress and others
Nelson v. Laskey et al
as 5:2023cv01754
Plaintiff:
Terrell Nelson
Defendant:
Capt Laskey, Lt Myers, Lt Bryzenski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Dudley (ID 91359) v. Kansas Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2023cv03074
Plaintiff:
James Richard Dudley
Defendant:
Kansas Department of Corrections, Jeff Zmuda, Darcie Holthaus and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCurry v. USA
as 3:2023cv00007
Petitioner:
Dextavious McCurry
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
(HC) McCurry v. Allison
as 1:2022cv01398
Petitioner:
Scott Allen McCurry
Respondent:
Kathleen Allison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
