Cases 1 - 10 of 6,028
Jones (PS) v. Deines et al
as 1:2024cv01429
Plaintiff:
Adam Jones
Defendant:
Curtis Deines, April Ogley, Robert Dick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Dr. Collins et al
as 3:2024cv00502
Plaintiff:
Shaquon RaShawn Johnson
Defendant:
Dr. Collins, Dr. A. Acevedo, Michelle Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRUCE v. FRANCESCHINI
as 1:2024cv06279
Petitioner:
MICHELLE BRUCE
Respondent:
REBBECCA FRANCESCHINI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Harris v. Wellpath LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00619
Plaintiff:
Robert Wayne Harris
Defendant:
Wellpath LLC, Michelle Irvine, Alexandria Neumeier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miles v. Doe 1 et al
as 3:2024cv01286
Plaintiff:
Billy Miles
Defendant:
John Doe #1 and David Michell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dowles v. Dauzat
as 5:2024cv00652
Plaintiff:
Desi Lamont Dowles, Jr
Defendant:
Michele Dauzat
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Barton v. Boyd et al
as 8:2024cv00180
Plaintiff:
James Barton
Defendant:
Taggart Boyd, Michele Wilholm, Case Manager Hassan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wolfe v. Rivello et al
as 3:2024cv00814
Petitioner:
James A Wolfe
Respondent:
John Rivello, Michelle A Henery, Seth F. Butner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mark Gooding v. Parole Board, et al
as 24-1438
Petitioner:
MARK ANTHONY GOODING
Respondent:
PAROLE BOARD and MICHELLE FLOYD, Warden
Hess #353733 v. Arizona, State of et al
as 4:2024cv00247
Plaintiff:
Greg John Hess
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Cochise, County of, Cochise County Superior Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
