Cases 1 - 10 of 519
Mobley v. USA
as 3:2024cv00536
Petitioner:
Douglas Jovan Mobley, Jr
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Mobley v. A.C.I. Mental Health
as 3:2024cv00560
Plaintiff:
Raheim Mobley
Defendant:
A.C.I. Mental Health
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kenneth Mobley v. DOJ, et al
as 24-5477
Plaintiff:
KENNETH MOBLEY
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, BUREAU OF PRISONS, WARDEN F. J. BOWERS, FCI Memphis and others
Hasuan v. Dept. of Community Supervision et al
as 2:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Asaad Amir Hasuan
Defendant:
Dept. of Community Supervision, Michael Bray and William Mobley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaun A. Jones v. C.O. Moisa et al
as 2:2024cv01819
Plaintiff:
Shaun A. Jones
Defendant:
C.O. Moisa, Sgt. John Doe One, John Doe One and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Mobley v. Garrett et al
as 2:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Mobley
Defendant:
Garrett, Bledsoe, Edge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mobley v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Duval)
as 3:2024cv00130
Petitioner:
Cashawn Mobley
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00083
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pollard v. Gurbutwai et al
as 1:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
Shane D. Pollard
Defendant:
Gurbutwai, Mobley, Koko and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Pinellas County Sheriff's Office et al
as 8:2023cv02756
Plaintiff:
Ryan Smith
Defendant:
Pinellas County Sheriff's Office, Sergeant Mobley, Officer Boylorn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
