Cases 1 - 10 of 162
WOODLEY SR. v. YOUNG et al
as 2:2024cv01619
Petitioner:
Jamal F. Woodley Sr.
Respondent:
David C Young, John R. Cornely, Larry Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Woodley Sr. v. Young et al
as 2:2024cv00669
Plaintiff:
Jamal F. Woodley Sr.
Defendant:
David C Young, Evan Poole, Toure' McCord and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McClure v. Trumbull County et al.
as 4:2024cv00116
Plaintiff:
Kristina McClure and Colton McClure, Deceased
Defendant:
Trumbull County, Paul S Monroe, Sheriff, Daniel Mason and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Monzon v. Whitehurst et al
as 3:2023cv00771
Plaintiff:
Roman Sebastian Monzon
Defendant:
Thomas Whitehurst, Eric T. Westfield, Ryan C. McCord and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crandle v. Headley et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00625
Plaintiff:
James Dlester Crandle
Defendant:
Joseph H. Headley, Capt. Surles, Lt. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ryan Clark v. USA
as 23-12795
Petitioner / Appellant:
RYAN MCCORD CLARK
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Jammes v. School et al
as 2:2023cv00911
Plaintiff:
Beau D Jammes
Defendant:
Lt School, Officer Mccord, Samantha Hoffer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wall v. McCord et al
as 1:2023cv02174
Plaintiff:
Darren R. Wall
Defendant:
Det. McCord, Sgt. Callas and Ofc. Karr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Ryan Clark v. USA
as 23-12249
Petitioner / Appellant:
RYAN MCCORD CLARK
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Gill v. Woelfel et al
as 2:2023cv00423
Plaintiff:
Charles B Gill, Sr
Defendant:
Jordan Woelfel, S Enneper, Alex Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
