Cases 1 - 10 of 32
McCafferty v. USA
as 5:2022cv00297
Petitioner:
Leslie Mechelle McCafferty
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Reynolds v. Delahoussaye et al
as 2:2022cv02423
Plaintiff:
Dashone Marcel Reynolds
Defendant:
Mechelle M. Delahoussaye, Daphne Powell, Brijuan Wornner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wyatts v. Dibbles-Larkin
as 6:2020cv01078
Defendant:
Lanandra Mechelle Dibbles-Larkin
Plaintiff:
Martina Marie Wyatts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Major v. Adams
as 3:2020cv00194
Petitioner:
Mechelle A. Major
Respondent:
Warden P. Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Williams v. Tolliver et al
as 5:2019cv01401
Defendant:
Sgt Starr, Vincent Coleman, Col Cottrell and others
Plaintiff:
Johnny R Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eckard v. Woods et al
as 2:2018cv00964
Defendant:
Lisa Anderson, Jack Warner, Kathy Grey and others
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Eckard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodney Connally v. Rusk County Jail, et al
as 17-40991
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RODNEY CONNALLY
Defendant - Appellee:
RUSK COUNTY JAIL, SHERIFF JEFF PRICE, RA-CHELLE ODUM, formerly known as Mechelle Doe and others
Chalmers v. Bautista et al
as 4:2017cv04150
Plaintiff:
Mark Chalmers
Defendant:
Catalino Bautista, Lois Lindorff, The Bantry Group Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Connally v. Rusk County Jail et al
as 6:2016cv00504
Plaintiff:
Rodney Connally
Defendant:
Rusk County Jail, Jeff Price, Mechelle Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NIBLACK v. UNIVERSITY CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE et al
as 2:2016cv01087
Plaintiff:
STANLEY L. NIBLACK
Defendant:
UNIVERSITY CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE, UNIVERSITY BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCARE, JEFFREY DICKERT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
