Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Marshall v. Sterling
as 1:2024cv01769
Plaintiff:
Mimi Joe Marshall
Defendant:
Bryan P. Sterling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Jeremy Kerr v. Keith Lenz, et al
as 23-3479
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEREMY LYNN KERR
Defendant / Appellee:
KEITH LENZ, EDWARD LEE SCHIMMEL, HIZER & SCHIMMEL and others
Nguyen v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv00093
Petitioner:
Thao Thi Nguyen, Mimi, Thao Ray and others
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
King v. Ryder et al
as 2:2022cv04190
Plaintiff:
Christopher King
Defendant:
Phillip Ryder, Chad Hall, Jacob Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Lawrence et al
as 3:2022cv00730
Plaintiff:
Antonius Carter
Defendant:
Mimi Lawrence, Chief Austin Boldie, Corporal Eric Yevin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kerr v. Lenz et al
as 3:2022cv01054
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Kerr
Defendant:
Keith Lenz, Edward L Schimmel, Hizer & Schimmel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Robinson v. Turin et al
as 0:2019cv62827
Defendant:
Mimi V. Turin and City of Ft.Lauderdale Attorney Generals Office
Plaintiff:
Sinclair Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Willingham v. Strangfeld et al
as 1:2019cv00231
Defendant:
Mikeal Robert William Pears, Todd Williams, Dina Micheall Boyd and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Dean Cassada Willingham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marshall v. Fox
as 1:2019cv02088
Defendant:
Mental Health Dept. of Corretion, Ms. Fox and Dept of Correction Inst.
Plaintiff:
Mr. Mimi Joe Marshall and Mimi Joe Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adames v. Decker et al
as 2:2019cv06364
Defendant:
KRISTJEN NIELSEN, Mimi Tsankov, Wen-Ting Cheng and others
Plaintiff:
Willi Adames
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
