Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Ofori v. Combs et al
as 7:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Terry K. Ofori
Defendant:
Mr. J. Combs, Mr. Anderson, Mr. W. Todd Farris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ofori v. Fleming et al
as 7:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
Terry K. Ofori
Defendant:
Leslie J. Fleming, Ms. R.D. Young, Mr. Joseph B. Stallard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARRERO-NARDO v. MASON et al
as 2:2023cv01382
Petitioner:
MR SAMUEL F MARRERO-NARDO, SR. and SAMUEL FRANK MARRERO-NARDO, SR.
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT BERNADETTE MASON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Little v. Samuel et al
as 9:2020cv03917
Defendant:
Mr K Williamson, Mr Samuel, Ms Edna and others
Plaintiff:
Allen Little, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Braveboy v. Key
as 3:2020cv03211
Respondent:
Mr. Samuel Key
Petitioner:
Mr Abram D Braveboy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Searcy v. Lynch et al
as 5:2015ct03282
Plaintiff:
Edgar Searcy
Defendant:
Loretta Lynch, Mr. Samuels and Unnamed Subordinates and Contract Employees
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Kershner v. Davis et al
as 2:2014cv00378
Plaintiff:
Toby Kershner
Defendant:
Keith Davis, Mr. Parker, J. Boone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abudus-Sabur v. F.M.C. Rochester Minnesota et al
as 0:2013cv02528
Plaintiff:
Jason Abudus-Sabur
Defendant:
F.M.C. Rochester Minnesota, Linda Sanders, Mr. Samuels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McFadden et al v. Fuller et al
as 5:2013cv02290
Plaintiff:
Bernard McFadden
Defendant:
Marcia Fuller , Michael L Fair, Boyd H Parr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tyrrall Farrow Cannon v. K Harris et al
as 2:2013cv01972
Plaintiff:
Tyrrall Farrow Cannon
Defendant:
Kamala Harris, Kamala Harris, Mr Lane and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
