Cases 1 - 10 of 45
Taylor v. United States of America et al
as 3:2022cv00546
Plaintiff:
Ezekiel I Taylor and Ezekiel Taylor
Defendant:
United States of America, State of Indiana, Indiana Department Of Corrections/MCF and others
Not Classified By Court:
MIAMI E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TAYLOR et al v. UNITED STATE OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2022cv01333
Plaintiff:
EZEKIEL TAYLOR
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF INDIANA, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS/MCF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Newton et al
as 1:2022cv00429
Petitioner:
Mr. Nathaniel Johnson, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden McKendley Newton, Mr. Alan M. Wilson and South Carolina, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Frakes
as 8:2022cv00068
Petitioner:
Chabre Nathaniel Johnson
Respondent:
Scott R. Frakes
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Austin
as 3:2019cv01087
Petitioner:
Nathaniel Johnson
Respondent:
Glen Austin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Taylor v. Johnson et al
as 3:2018cv00558
Defendant:
Nathaniel Johnson, Jonathan London and Darrel Vannoy
Plaintiff:
Henry Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Pascoe et al
as 1:2018cv00324
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Johnson, Jr
Defendant:
David M. Pascoe, Jr., Timothy M. Wogan, Melissa M. Milligan-Kirby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Williams
as 8:2017cv02733
Petitioner:
Nathaniel Johnson
Respondent:
Mr Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. Foster
as 3:2017cv00931
Petitioner:
Nathaniel Johnson
Respondent:
Craig Foster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. Foster
as 3:2017cv00909
Petitioner:
Nathaniel Johnson
Respondent:
Craig Foster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
