Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Christian #815288 v. Rewerts et al
as 1:2024cv00159
Plaintiff:
James Christian #815288
Defendant:
Randee Rewerts, Unknown Gregory, Unknown Bigalow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nevis v. Bowau et al
as 3:2022cv05986
Plaintiff:
Kimball Nevis
Defendant:
Mr Bowau, Brian Newcomer, Mr Randy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Payne v. Faith et al
as 1:2022cv00217
Plaintiff:
Joshua Isaac Payne
Defendant:
Walter Faith, B. Mason, L. White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ecckles #298965, Jr. v. Michigan Department of Corrections al
as 1:2021cv00761
Plaintiff:
William Lewis Ecckles Jr. #298965 and William Lewis Ecckles #298965, Jr.
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Unknown Rewerts, Heidi E. Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jennings v. Ivey et al
as 1:2020cv00399
Defendant:
Doctor Bose, Therapist Pearson, Jefferson Dunn and others
Plaintiff:
Nevis Jennings
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jennings v. Woodget et al
as 1:2020cv00325
Defendant:
Sedricks Woodget, Jarmaine Bullard and Hasheen Bennett
Plaintiff:
Nevis Jennings, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jesse Youngblood v. Briggs, et al
as 16-16626
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JESSE L. YOUNGBLOOD
Defendant - Appellee:
BRIGGS, M. NEVIS, D. FOSTON and others
Youngblood v. Briggs, et al.,
as 2:2015cv01865
Plaintiff:
Jesse L. Youngblood
Defendant:
Briggs, M Nevis, D. Foston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robbie Thomas v. Charlie Brinich, et al
as 14-1607
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBBIE THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLIE BRINICH, Psychologist, MR. MAJOR VUKSTA, C/O SMITH, of Former "A" Block and others
Robbie Thomas v. Charlie Brinich, et al
as 12-3839
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBBIE THOMAS
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLIE BRINICH, Psychologist, MAJOR VUKSTA, SMITH, Lieutenant, of Former "A" Block and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
