Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Brown v. Shaffer et al
as 1:2018cv00470
Plaintiff:
Keith A. Brown
Defendant:
Jennifer Shaffer, Line Brynjulfsen, Michelle Minor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2017cv04017
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Coupchiak, et al v. Multnomah County, et al
as 3:2017cv01156
Defendant:
American Medical Response HPPP, LLC, City of Portland, Multnomah County and others
Plaintiff:
William Coupchiak, John O'Hara and Wendy Windham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Avalos v. Buck et al
as 4:2017cv00250
Plaintiff:
Raymond A Avalos
Defendant:
Joseph Buck, Unknown O'Hara, Unknown Martino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Hara v. Mosher et al
as 3:2017cv00916
Plaintiff:
Thomas O'Hara
Defendant:
Neil Mosher and Mark Berkoski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson et al. v. Dayton et al.
as 0:2017cv00880
Plaintiff:
Tony Dejuan Jackson, Similarly Situated Prisoner's at All Minnesota Correctional Facilities and Other similarly Situated Prisoner's At Rush City Correctional Facility
Defendant:
Mark Dayton, Tina Smith, Tom Roy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. O'Hara et al
as 9:2016cv00527
Plaintiff:
Robert Adams, III
Defendant:
David O'Hara, K. Kirkwood, C. Curtis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Hara v. USA
as 1:2016cv00306
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Dennis O'Hara
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Beauregard v. Stephens et al
as 4:2016cv00290
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Allan Beauregard
Defendant:
William Stephens, O'Hara, Estelle Unit Medical Infirmary and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Dayton et al
as 0:2015cv04429
Plaintiff:
Tony Dejuan Jackson
Defendant:
Mark Dayton , Tina Smith , Tom Roy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
