Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Roberts v. Blitch et al
as 3:2023cv01134
Plaintiff:
James Elton Roberts
Defendant:
William B. Blitch, Bayron, Captain Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Godhigh v. Centurion Medical Dep. et al
as 3:2023cv00695
Plaintiff:
Mario Godhigh
Defendant:
Centurion Medical Dep., Correction Officer Coleman and Correction Officer Crawford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Lappett et al
as 5:2022cv02132
Plaintiff:
Marcus Antonio Woods
Defendant:
Officer Lappett, Nurse Shannon and Officer Coleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Brooks v. Felts et al
as 2:2022cv02077
Plaintiff:
Unique Brooks
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Felts, Correctional Officer Coleman, Correctional Officer Lowery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JAMES v. BOP CENTRAL OFFICE, COLEMAN USP-1
as 1:2022cv00261
Petitioner:
CALVIN JAMES
Respondent:
BOP CENTRAL OFFICE, COLEMAN USP-1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JAMES v. BOP CENTRAL OFFICE, COLEMAN USP-1
as 1:2021cv03131
Plaintiff:
CALVIN B. JAMES
Defendant:
BOP CENTRAL OFFICE, COLEMAN USP-1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Seifried v. Major Mack, et al
as 3:2021cv00156
Defendant:
Unknown, Officer Coleman, Officer Campbell and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Seifried
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rudolph v. McCoy et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00867
Defendant:
Mrs. McCovery, T. Jones, D. Lovejoy and others
Plaintiff:
Travis Sentell Rudolph
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. McCoy et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00841
Defendant:
Mrs. McCovery, T. Jones, D. Lovejoy and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WATSON v. ENGLISH et al
as 1:2019cv00945
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS L. WATSON
Defendant:
OFFICER ENGLISH, OFFICER M. JOHNSON and OFFICER COLEMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
