Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Oxley v. Madrigal et al
as 5:2023cv02371
Plaintiff:
Samuel Russ Oxley
Defendant:
Madrigal, Santiago, Spangler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oxley v. Contra Costa County Sheriff Department et al
as 4:2023cv00510
Plaintiff:
Samuel Russ Oxley
Defendant:
Contra Costa County Sheriff Department, Samuel Jones, Daniel Husted and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flores v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2021cv01680
Defendant:
CO Vasquez, CO Benitez, CO Rodriguez and others
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Flores
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHAFFER v. BRYSON et al
as 5:2018cv00459
Defendant:
JANE DOE, COMMISSIONER HOMER BRYSON, DEBBIE OXLEY and others
Plaintiff:
JOHNNIE WILLARD SHAFFER, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaffer v. Bryson et al
as 1:2018cv05459
Defendant:
John Doe, Georgia Department of Corrections, Jane Doe 3 and others
Plaintiff:
Johnnie Willard Shaffer, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cano v. Officer Oxley et al
as 1:2018cv03428
Defendant:
Officer Mullgrave, Department of Corrections, Officer Frammosa and others
Plaintiff:
Christoper Hiram Cano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Oxley et al v. South Central Regional Jail
as 2:2017cv03915
Plaintiff:
Thomas Edward Oxley, Jr., Chad Day and Brandon Scotty Shultz
Defendant:
South Central Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALLAH v. CHRISTIE et al
as 3:2016cv01046
Plaintiff:
KUTAME ALLAH
Defendant:
CHRIS CHRISTIE, KIM GUADAGNO, JOHN HOFFMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rankins v. Oxley et al
as 1:2015cv00496
Plaintiff:
Keith Allen Rankins
Defendant:
C. S. Oxley, Dwayne Williams and Houston Norris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Aramark Food Corp. et al
as 2:2015cv01112
Plaintiff:
Robert Martin
Defendant:
Aramark Food Corp., Barlett, Oxley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
