Cases 1 - 10 of 13
MARTIN v. GUILLIE et al
as 1:2018cv03161
Defendant:
COLENON, SPANGLER, LUNSFORD and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY C. MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Overfield v. USA
as 2:2018cv02095
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Julie Ann Overfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
MARTIN v. STURGELL et al
as 1:2018cv01848
Defendant:
BOLMAN, COCKERN, COLENON and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY C. MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Overfield v. USA
as 2:2016cv03095
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Julie Ann Overfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Overfield v. USA
as 2:2016cv02005
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Julie Ann Overfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Moore v. Peters et al
as 6:2013cv06271
Plaintiff:
Kenneth E. Moore
Defendant:
J. Peters, Reynolds, Caslin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wardrick v. United States Government et al
as 6:2011cv00197
Plaintiff:
Robert Wardrick
Defendant:
United States Government, Bureau of Prisons, Eric D. Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ashford v. Dennison
as 10-1301
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Mauern Jerome Ashford
Defendant - Appellee:
Robert Dennison, Chairman, New York State Division of Parole, Glenn S. Goord, Commissioner, New York State Department of Correctional Services, T. E. Murray, Superintendent, Gowanda Correctional Facility and others
Mark Arflack v. County of Henderson, Kentucky, et al
as 09-6298
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK C. ARFLACK
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF HENDERSON, KENTUCKY, RON HERRINGTON, Jailer, In His Individual and Official Capacity, FREDDIE ROWLAND, Chief Deputy, In His Individual and Official Capacity and others
Robert Wardrick v. US
as 09-6561
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT JUNIOR WARDRICK
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JAMES H. GREEN, Cop or Prosecutor, ALEXANDRA WILLIAM, Judge and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
