Cases 1 - 10 of 10
White v. Payne et al
as 2:2022cv00110
Plaintiff:
Asher White
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Marshall Reed, P Arnold and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gunn v. MTC-EMCF et al
as 3:2017cv00815
Plaintiff:
LaBoris O. Gunn
Defendant:
MTC-EMCF, Centurion Medical, P. Arnold and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tidwell v. Cervantes et al
as 5:2017cv00068
Plaintiff:
Richard Tidwell
Defendant:
Elsa A Cervantes, Norvil P Arnold and Agency of TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gardner v. Zavadil et al
as 6:2016cv06108
Plaintiff:
Avery Gardner
Defendant:
Terry V. Zavadil, Jacob K. King, Terrie L Banister and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ARNOLD v. SUPERINTENDENT et al
as 2:2016cv05539
Petitioner:
SHAWN P. ARNOLD
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gardner v. Zavadil et al
as 4:2016cv00741
Plaintiff:
Avery Gardner
Defendant:
Terry V Zavadil, Jacob K King, Terrie L Banister and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Arnold et al
as 6:2016cv06036
Plaintiff:
Richard Robinson
Defendant:
P. Arnold, Mary Parker-Reed, Benny Magness and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALKHALIDI v. PURCELL et al
as 1:2014cv01392
Plaintiff:
ABDULLAH ALKHALIDI
Defendant:
P. ARNOLD, RICHARD BROWN, S. BURRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALKHALIDI et al v. ARNOLD et al
as 1:2014cv01391
Plaintiff:
ABDULLAH ALKHALIDI and K STONE
Defendant:
CORRECTION OFFICER P. ARNOLD, RICHARD BROWN, S. BURRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Hudges et al
as 3:2007cv00349
Plaintiff:
Michael Alexander Jackson
Defendant:
James Hudges, P. Arnold and K. Golden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
