Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Alleyne v. Tomlinson et al
as 3:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Alleyne
Defendant:
L. Tomlinson, P. Henry, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caraffa #350727 v. Moyer et al
as 4:2023cv00572
Plaintiff:
Alfred Erika Caraffa
Defendant:
M Moyer, Arizona Department of Corrections Rehabilitation and Reentry, Arizona, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Caraffa v. Thornell et al
as 4:2023cv00375
Plaintiff:
Alfred Erik Caraffa
Defendant:
Ryan Thornell, Arizona Department of Corrections, Arizona, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Caraffa v. Thornell
as 2:2023cv01594
Plaintiff:
Alfred Erik Caraffa
Defendant:
Ryan Thornell, Arizona Department of Corrections Rehabilitation and Reentry, Arizona, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Glover et al v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2018cv02270
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Wexford Corp, Steve Meeks and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Glover, Curtis A Clark, Danny Lillard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01671
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Henry v. Pollard
as 2:2011cv01154
Petitioner:
Eric P Henry
Respondent:
William Pollard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Emile Henry, II v. Pat Smith
as 11-1633
Petitioner - Appellant:
Emile P. Henry, II
Respondent - Appellee:
Pat Smith
Henry v. State of Missouri
as 4:2007cv01835
Petitioner:
Emile P. Henry, II
Respondent:
State of Missouri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lopez v. Wallace et al
as 1:2007cv01505
Plaintiff:
Jesus Maria Lopez
Defendant:
Michael Wallace, Stephanie Stuckey Benfield, Traci Soderberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
